Most teams building AI Agents get something working faster than they expect. A conversational interface responds correctly, the model calls a tool, and the demo lands well with stakeholders. For a moment, it feels like the hard part is done.
Then reality hits as you start to expand it.
How does this agent run continuously instead of as a one-off interaction? How do you prevent it from taking unauthorized actions? How do you explain its behavior to a security team, an auditor, or a customer asking why a specific decision was made?
This is the point where many agent projects stall. The failure isn’t usually the model; it’s the system around it. The difference between a prototype and a product isn’t a better prompt. It is architecture. Specifically, it requires decoupling the “intelligence” (the LLM) from the “orchestration” (the system).
Key Takeaways:
- Orchestration is Infrastructure: The agent decides what to do; the system decides how and if to execute it.
- State Must Be External: Storing workflow state inside the prompt guarantees data loss and audit failures.
- Zero-Trust Execution: Treat every tool call from an agent as untrusted user input that requires validation.
Why Most AI Agent Systems Break Under Real Use
Early agent systems tend to blend everything together. The agent reasons, stores Context, accesses data, calls tools, and executes actions in a single loop. That approach works fine for a hackathon, but it collapses when the system needs to scale, recover from failure, or pass a SOC2 review.
Once an agent has direct access to sensitive data or production systems, every mistake becomes expensive. Retries become dangerous, and debugging becomes guesswork. Most importantly, audit trails disappear because the state lives inside ephemeral prompts rather than systems designed to record it.
We advise clients to invert this model. The enterprise agent should function as a decision engine, not an executor. It requests an action, but the Orchestration Layer handles the timeout, the retry logic, and the permission check. This ensures the system remains deterministic even when the model is probabilistic.
The Artifact Layer: A System of Record
Production systems require a dedicated Artifact Layer. This is a distinct database where conversation history, tool outputs, and intermediate decisions are stored permanently.
This architecture solves two critical problems found in standard Case Studies. First, it creates a security boundary where the LLM only sees references to sensitive data rather than the raw data itself. Second, it generates a forensic audit trail. If an agent makes a mistake, you can replay the state from the Artifact Layer to diagnose exactly why the decision was made.
Two Agent Patterns That Hold Up in Production
Not all agents behave the same way, and forcing them into a single model leads to unnecessary complexity. In practice, production systems separate agents into two broad categories: Deterministic and Interactive.
| Feature | Deterministic Agents | Interactive Agents |
| Trigger | Schedules or system events (Webhooks). | User sessions (Chat/Voice). |
| Primary Goal | Classification, routing, or data extraction. | Multi-turn reasoning and problem solving. |
| State Lifespan | Ephemeral (lives only for the transaction). | Long-running (persists across sessions). |
| Testing | High coverage (inputs/outputs are predictable). | Statistical coverage (evals required). |
| Ideal For | Background automation, document processing. | Customer support, internal research tools. |
Both patterns rely on the same underlying infrastructure. The difference lies in how much control is delegated to the agent versus retained by the system.
Why Workflow Orchestration Is Central
Enterprise AI agents are rarely short-lived. They monitor systems, respond to events, and coordinate multiple steps across services. They must continue working even when parts of the system fail or an API times out.
This is where tools like Wippy fit into the stack. Workflow Orchestration provides a durable execution layer that handles retries, timeouts, and resumes work after interruptions. The agent does not manage any of that; it simply participates in a structured process. When orchestration is separated from intelligence, the system becomes predictable and easier to test.
Common Failure Modes in Production
The “God Mode” Agent
We often see teams trying to make a single prompt handle routing, execution, and summarization. The context window gets muddy, and instruction adherence drops. The solution is to decompose the workflow: use specialized agents for specific steps and a deterministic router to manage the handoffs between them.
The Phantom State
If a workflow crashes (e.g., a server restart) and the agent forgets where it was in a multi-step process, the system is fragile. By using durable execution frameworks (like Temporal), the system can resume exactly where it left off, independent of the model’s memory.
The Unsupervised Loop
An agent entering a retry loop can burn thousands of dollars in tokens in minutes. This requires hard-coded circuit breakers in the orchestration layer, forcing the loop to break regardless of what the prompt says.”Trust is not a sentiment in engineering. It is a verifiable constraint. A production agent system is designed under the assumption that the model will try to do something wrong. The infrastructure will block it,“ Anton Titov, Spiral Scout’s CTO and creator of Wippy.ai explained.
Zero-Trust Execution for AI Agents
A common failure mode is assuming the model knows what it is allowed to do. In a production environment, that assumption does not hold.
Every tool invocation must be validated. Every argument must match a known schema. Every action must be checked against user permissions. If an agent attempts to call something that does not exist or is not allowed, the system must reject it safely.
This zero-trust approach treats agent output as input that needs validation, not instructions that must be followed. It prevents hallucinations from turning into incidents and keeps responsibility where it belongs: inside the platform.
The Long-Term Architecture Bet
The decision to separate orchestration from intelligence is a bet on ownership. When you build distinct workflows, data layers, and permission structures, you own the business logic. The LLM becomes a swappable component.
If you rely on a black-box platform where the prompt is the only logic, you own nothing but a subscription. We build custom services to ensure our clients hold the IP that matters.
Tired of AI demos that don’t survive production?
Let’s audit your architecture for a system you can actually own.
